Indigenous Health for Mixed Blood- myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theIndigenous Healthfor Mixed Blood. Answer: Introduction The aboriginal people were the first Australians or the indigenous Australians who made their way in to the native land of Australia through the waterways. These people were found to be deep rooted to their culture or land and were found to have a strong spiritual connection. They would mostly gather their food from fishing and hunting habits. However, with the advent of the British in 1768, the aboriginal people had to go through a massacre. It resulted in a destruction of their race and culture by removing them forcibly out of the land, which once belonged to them. The aboriginal people had to lose their lands, which envisaged the beginning of a tumultuous civilization for them. The current assignment discusses the question pertaining to higher success rates of aboriginal people with mixed blood. Success rate of aboriginal people with mixed blood The current decade has seen higher number of people with mixed blood and with higher success rates. Statistical analysis and reports from the 2006 census have suggested that 52% of aboriginal men and 55% aboriginal women have parents from different nationalities. This provides a number of advantages to the Australian aboriginal people with mixed origin. The rates have been lower in indigenous Australians settled in the rural areas compared to the ones exposed to the city way of life. As commented by Sushames et al. (2016, p.129), the rate of cross-cultural exchange was more in the cities compared to the rural areas. This helped in the mixing of the people from different races along with the establishment of a new civilization. However, the rates were found to be low in Queensland, Western Australia and northern territory. As commented by Lobo et al. (2015, p.399), only aboriginal people with high qualifications were more prone to settle in the cities and were likely to marry within c ross cultures. A number of benefits as well as limitations were encountered by the mixed race aboriginal Australians. The mixed couple have been found to be in a better economic position than the indigenous Australians due to high qualifications and better job opportunities. As commented by Carlson (2016, p.29), the cross-cultural connections provides them with an upper hand in dealing with the cultural paradoxes and settling for more genuine and practical reasons. However as argued by Hickey (2016, p.51), difficulty in identifying with any one culture can often have a profound effect on their way of life. As commented by Currie et al. (2013, p.7), presence of traits of a particular genetic disease in one of the parents can result in serious health implications in the generations to come. However, the Australian aboriginal people with mixed blood have more chances of being successful in their career compared to others. This is because they have better exposure to the basic amenities in life such as health, education among other factors. As commented by Kelaher et al. (2014, p.45), such mixed people have better educational forums available to them which reciprocates into higher success rates. Moreover, they have a better health amenity, which provides them with better cope up and survival strategies. The question here analyses the factors contributing to the high success rates of the mixed culture aboriginal group. The question rightly pinpoints towards the various factors, which might play a contributory factor in the success rates of the aboriginal mixed culture groups. Some of the dominating factor includes better education and better job opportunities. However, the question provides a rather one-sided overview of the present discrimination culture within the Australian mainland. It fails to take into consideration the constitutional laws or arrangements which forms a basis for such discrimination. Social discrimination in aboriginal culture The Australians of aboriginal races have been exposed to social discrimination ever since the advent of the British. The advent of the British in the Australian mainland brought about a huge paradigm in the colonisation pattern. This resulted in development of fierce competition for possession of landmasses, which were previously inherited by the aboriginals earlier. The discrimination, being mainly racial or cultural discrimination, where an individual in wrongly treated due to belonging to certain area, region or religion. As mentioned by Bodkin-Andrews and Carlson (2016, p.802), the discrimination often have a negative effect on the minds of the people. Most of the time the discrimination was attributed to belonging to a certain culture or talking in a distinct language. The language often promulgates in huge communication gaps resulting in intensifying the cultural barriers (Scalley et al. 2013, p.530). People can internalise the negative comments resulting in the development of stress within an individual. The stress often has much more serious consequences such as depression and suicidal behaviours in an individual. As mentioned by Walter (2016, p.25), such depressive behaviour can often propagate an individual towards much more grave issues such as alcohol and drug use. A recent study conducted have highlighted that nearly 20% of the indigenous Australians have suffered severe forms of discrimination within the workplace and other social contexts (Levinson and Hooley, 2014, p.375). Exclusion/inclusion in Australian aboriginal culture The Australian aboriginal people faced a number of inclusion and exclusion principles, which often had a profound effect on their way of life. The social exclusion could be attributed to the presence of racial discrimination present within the society. The racial discrimination often resulted in the lack of sufficient opportunities to an individual in terms of health and education. As commented by Baldry and Cunneen (2014, p.280), the social exclusion can often result in the internalization of negative feelings within an individual. This resulted in the development of cultural stereotypes, which further affected the aspect of cross-cultural communication and exchange of knowledge. However, as argued by Currie et al. (2013, p.9), the mixed aboriginal culture had much better chances of social inclusion. This could be attributed rich cultural diversity, which provided with an upper hand in establishment of effective communication interface socially. The social inclusion can open up wider decision-making platform to the Australian aboriginal culture. This can help in improving their standards of life and overall well being of an individual. Indigenous disadvantage can often result in enhanced rates of poverty in the Australian aboriginal culture. Thus, wider inclusion policies implemented by the government further helped in meeting the cultural demands and requisites of the Australian aboriginal culture. Conclusion The current study focuses on the question of the high success rate in the mixed aboriginal rate. The question emphasizes upon the different benefits and challenges faced by the Australian aboriginal mixed breed of people. The study helped in evaluating that there are a number of factors responsible for providing a better socially inclusive platform to an individual. Evidence and reports have suggested that having one of the parents from a different cultural background can provide economic as well as social advantages to the indigenous social group. Thus, social acceptance is received more easily in the second case along with better health and educational facilities. Moreover, a cross-cultural exchange helps in removing the traditional myths and fears from the minds of the aboriginal people. However, the study fails to take into consideration the various loopholes present within the constitutional policies and reforms presented by the government. The reforms helps in identification of the different areas where there is a need to implement more equipped policies and frameworks. The betterment of life of the Australian aboriginal culture can be further guaranteed with the help of mainstream inclusion of the mixed classes. References Baldry, E. and Cunneen, C., (2014). Imprisoned Indigenous women and the shadow of colonial patriarchy.Australian New Zealand Journal of Criminology,47(2), pp.276-298. Bodkin-Andrews, G. and Carlson, B., (2016). The legacy of racism and Indigenous Australian identity within education.Race Ethnicity and Education,19(4), pp.784-807. Carlson, B., (2016). Positioning'part-Aboriginal'people.The Politics of Identity: Who counts as Aboriginal today?, p.29. Carlson, B., (2016). Quantifying Aboriginality by acculturation, adaptation and allegiance.The Politics of Identity: Who counts as Aboriginal today?, p.53. Currie, C.L., Wild, T.C., Schopflocher, D.P., Laing, L. and Veugelers, P., (2013). Illicit and prescription drug problems among urban Aboriginal adults in Canada: the role of traditional culture in protection and resilience.Social Science Medicine,88, pp.1-9. Hickey, S., (2016). Whats in a label: social factors and health issues for a small group of Aboriginal people born in Brisbane, Australia. Kelaher, M.A., Ferdinand, A.S. and Paradies, Y., (2014). Experiencing racism in health care: the mental health impacts for Victorian Aboriginal communities.The Medical journal of Australia,201(1), pp.44-47. Levinson, M. and Hooley, N., (2014). Supporting the learning of nomadic communities across transnational contexts: exploring parallels in the education of UK Roma Gypsies and Indigenous Australians.Research Papers in Education,29(4), pp.373-389. Lobo, R., Mascarenhas, L., Worthington, D., Bevan, J. and Mak, D.B., (2015). Evaluation of the regional nurse-supported hepatitis C shared care program in Western Australia: a mixed methods study.BMC health services research,15(1), p.399. Scalley, B., Gee, A., Katzenellenbogen, J.M., Gilles, M., Jegasothy, E. and Thompson, S.C., (2016). Improving the management of acute coronary syndrome for Aboriginal and non?Aboriginal patients in a regional hospital.Australian and New Zealand journal of public health,40(6), pp.529-534. Sushames, A., Uffelen, J.G. and Gebel, K., (2016). Do physical activity interventions in Indigenous people in Australia and New Zealand improve activity levels and health outcomes? A systematic review.International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity,13(1), p.129. Walter, M., (2016). Social exclusion/inclusion for urban Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.Social Inclusion,4(1).